We are everywhere bombarded with
information and knowledge claims.
Information includes everything from bus time tables and tide charts to
the chemical analysis of complex substances.
Knowledge claims go beyond this.
We find people who claim to know all sorts of things, from the nature of
the True God to the way society ought to be arranged for the good of all. Simple information is not worth worrying
about. We know what it is and how to
come by it. Information can be timely or
out of date, accurate or imprecise, but, within limited contexts, we have
agreed ways of telling true information from false. It is another thing altogether when knowledge
claims conflict and there is no agreed means of telling what is true. We see
these claims argued out in the marketplace of ideas and on the battlefields of
the world.
Benign skepticism is an attitude of mind
that looks at all the warring knowledge claims and refuses to be drawn into the
battle. It refuses to take sides, but
can see both sides. In the last three or
four centuries, philosophical skepticism has been associated with a radical
questioning of all knowledge. I am
talking about a different kind of skepticism, one that accepts knowledge with a
little "k". There are things
that only a fool would doubt.
In ancient times, there were two sorts of
skeptics, the dogmatic and the agnostic. The dogmatic skeptics held that
knowledge is impossible, and that even if it were possible, it would be
incommunicable. They argue against the
possibility of knowledge. Their role is entirely negative. All dogmatic
skeptics can do is to rebut knowledge claims and find ways to argue against the
possibility of knowledge in general. To my mind, this is too dogmatic and turns
skepticism in to a kind of knowledge, knowledge of the impossibility of
knowledge. The agnostic skeptics,
alternatively, do not claim to know that knowledge is impossible. They are open-minded about the possibility of
finding what they seek. In the original sense of the Greek, skeptics are those
who seek knowledge and truth. Even if they should spend their whole lives
seeking, but never finding, the final answers, still, they will have escaped
the morass of conflicting knowledge claims and continued to learn.
No comments:
Post a Comment