Each
individual lives at a historically precise intersection of local settings and
global conditions. In the past, this
intersection was less consciously global. Great distances and slow
communication ensured this. Lately, new
systems of communication throw us into a truly global world. The world appears as a whole from one
ideological perspective or another. However, it is possible to multiply
perspectives and come at the world from different angles. We are now in a
position to see the interrelations that are making us think globally.
What are truly
global concerns? Obvious ones are natural disasters, famine, disease, war,
pollution, social injustice, racism, sexism, animal rights, biodiversity,
genetic engineering, weapons of mass destruction, defoliation, global warming,
the spread of democracy, human rights, and the increasing difference between
rich and poor. To take one example,
deforestation may not seem to matter to a desert country, but the extent that
such denuding changes rain and weather patterns, it could make a great deal of
difference in the long run. All these concerns are "long term."
What are local
concerns? There is no telling what these may be in the absence of a social
setting. The local concerns of people displaced by an earthquake in the winter,
for example, would be tents, blankets, food, warmth and medical assistance,
international cooperation, and volunteers to look for survivors. In relatively
peaceful towns, local needs might come down to filling potholes, or finding a
playing field for the children to use. Of course, towns and cities are also
affected by global conditions, and this will affect local needs. Other local concerns transcend particular
localities but are not truly global, like the question of gay marriage, female
priests, gay bishops, whether marijuana or prostitution ought to be legalized.
How will the
individual react to this intersection?
It depends upon the individual's character, habits of
action, thought and emotion, attitudes and orientation in a world of values,
moral aesthetic or social. Some will
feel the global conditions more acutely than others. Some will ignore, as far
as possible, the global conditions as long term and thus not applicable to
them, though their descendants may feel the effects. Others will be forced to
put them together, as when the earthquake does strike and you are suddenly in
the street with nothing. In morality, we
have obligations to those who are physically close to us as well as those who
live half way across the world. Both the local and the global concerns have
their pull. The important thing is to
see that there is a choice where one's commitments lie, in the
local, the global, or, with difficulty, in both.
No comments:
Post a Comment