Not just living, but living well, is a
question worth exploring with the help of philosophy. From its history, we can
gather thoughts about living well that invite rational scrutiny. Philosophers
give reasons for their views, and do not rely, for the most part, on authority
or revelation to carry the day. We may not agree with them, but from ancient
times to the present, philosophers have explored many ideas about living well,
the nature of a good life for human beings, the art of living, and the best
routes to happiness.
The ancient Greeks wished their friends to
'do well' and 'fare well' in life. Doing well means acting morally and justly.
Faring well has to do with prosperity, good health and general flourishing. The
art of living is to become skilled in this. It is learning to do well oneself
and create the best chances of faring well in life. Doing well and faring well
differ, to my mind, in that the latter requires a bit of luck and the
cooperation of a wider world. Doing well (acting justly in the world) is within
one's own power and requires no external conditions to make it possible.
Ancient philosophy, in particular, has much to tell us about these topics.
Consider the Stoics and Epicureans.
The Stoics hammered home the point that no
one can force us to do evil and that there are worse things than death. What happens to us cannot determine how we
think and feel. Our responses to what happens to us can come under our own
control. In addition, they advocated detachment and a lessening of desires as a
way to combat the sufferings of life. For the early Stoics, the art of living
meant cultivating 'Ataraxia' or 'Painlessness', and this meant becoming
indifferent to the things most people crave the most. According to Zeno, the
first Stoic, we are to become indifferent to pleasure and pain, wealth and
poverty, health and illness, indeed, life and death themselves. Each of these goods and evils are of no value
in themselves, and are never to be preferred or avoided at the expense of reason
and virtue. The art of living, for the Stoics, means following the universal
laws of nature and facing whatever comes your way with equanimity, neither
exulting in victory nor despairing in defeat. Stoic wisdom is all about doing
your duty as reason and nature direct your reflective actions. Wisdom is the
goal, not pleasure. At best, pleasure is a distraction from duty. At worst, it
is destructive of the lives and fortunes of persons. Wisdom and right action
are the goals of life.
The Epicureans also claim to follow reason
and nature, but here pleasure in one form or another recommends itself as the
good we all seek for ourselves. Its founder, Epicurus, tells us that life is
simple, the good is easily within our grasp, and happiness is living in harmony
with your friends. Nothing more is needed. In fact, having more than one needs
to satisfy legitimate animal desires leads to an uneasy mind filled with
imaginary fears of losing what you do not need in the first place. The art of
living, here, is to develop the skill to avoid the idols and temptations of the
world, and simply to cultivate your garden in harmony with yourself and nature.
For Epicurus, the art of living gives us
the ability to maintain peace of mind. Part of this freedom comes in releasing
an excessive fear of death. Such a fear, more than any other, hinders us in
living. Death is nothing, and so nothing to fear. “Where I am, death is not.
Where death is, I am not.” And if you say that it is precisely this 'nothing'
that you fear, the reply is that it can only be something to fear while you are
alive, so why waste the time. Again, we
can lessen our fears by negotiating life in such a way as to avoid the shoals
of superstition and the stares of vengeful gods. If gods exist, and are happy,
then they will not associate themselves with unhappy humans. If the gods do not
exist, it is the same. Stick to natural desires, which are easy to satisfy.
Avoid vain desires that are expensive to satisfy and cause mental disturbances.
Both the Stoics and Epicureans have worked
out ways of living that recognize the pains and sufferings of human existence
while negotiating a way through them. It is true that Stoics tend to keep the
idea of God to give the universe a providential frame, but they revere the God of
reason and the laws of nature. The stoic follows nature and tries to see
everything that happens as only a tiny part of a greater universe. The
Epicureans do without supernatural consolation, but since no one will ever
taste death (only dying), we do not have to worry about it. Where the
philosophy of Epicurus sits uneasily is in philosophies or religions that
denigrate the body and, especially, the pleasures of the body. However, when we
read what Epicurus said, it turns out that the life he recommends is miles away
from the common idea of hedonists as irrational pleasure seekers and addicts.
Plain living and high thinking are his prescriptions for the good life. Though
the stoics and Epicureans disagree, there is nothing to stop us learning from
their insights about how to do well and fare well in this (human) life.
No comments:
Post a Comment